Headed to the polls to vote on Proposition 123 Tuesday? Here’s what you need to know:
The proposal
Proposition 123 would add $3.5 billion to state education funding over the next decade by using more money from the state’s land trust.
What are state trust lands?
When Arizona was on the verge of statehood in 1910, the federal government “trusted” us with more than 9 million acres of land. The state is able to earn revenue on this land from selling portions of it.
What does this have to do with public education?
The State Land Department, created in 1915, came up with 13 beneficiaries for this land. K-12 education is the lead beneficiary.
Every year, 2.5 percent of the money earned from the land trust goes toward K-12 education.
Prop 123 would increase this designation from 2.5 percent to 6.9 percent, which could potentially mean taking more money than is earned from the land.
“It’s like taking the land itself,” Arizona State University real estate expert Mark Stapp said. “You’ll be distributing funds greater than what it’s earning.”
So where does the money go? It’s important to note that the $3.5 billion, if Prop 123 passes, is not specifically designated to go into the classrooms. According to the bill passed in the state Legislature, the money is defined as “basic state aid.” So, school districts can spend the funds however they see fit. However, the money must still be used for public education.
The money allocated to districts would vary and be based on a complex formula, including the tax-base and number of students.
What about per-student funding?
Prop 123 is estimated to increase total funding, including state, federal and local sources, from the average of $8,599 per student to $8,917 per student, about $300. But that’s still less than the national average of $12,380.
At least 20 school districts in Maricopa County, based on fiscal year 2015 data, fund students less than the state average. Take a look at the map below:
Is the money guaranteed?
For the most part. If the economy were to tank, the inflation on the money could be stopped by the state.
“There are some triggers that would allow them to stop paying the inflation,” Arizona Department of Education spokesman Charles Tack said.
What happens after 10 years?
That’s the argument for many who are against Prop 123. Critics argue that it depletes the state’s land trust, which could hinder future generations of funding children. After the decade, funding levels would vary “based on market conditions,” according to ASU policy analyst Dan Hunting.
What else does Prop 123 do?
This law would settle a lawsuit filed by school districts in 2010 who claimed they did not receive mandated public education money from the state during the recession. Schools did not receive the inflation increases, which could total more than $1 billion, that they were entitled to during the recession. The original money was borne out of Proposition 301, which passed in 2000, allowing for an additional 0.6 percent sales tax.
What if Prop 123 doesn’t pass?
According to Hunting, the lawsuit against the state would continue in court. The court battle could take years.
