PHOENIX - A pro-business measure moving forward in the Arizona Legislature would make it harder for recently unemployed people to qualify for unemployment insurance benefits.
The measure would require unemployed workers to present documents showing they were fired before they can receive unemployment insurance benefits. Under current law, the burden is on employers to fight fraudulent claims.
The Republican-led effort would prevent people who quit from collecting benefits, proponents argue. The proposed change follows complaints from business groups about workers who walk off jobs and then file for benefits. A Republican-led Senate committee approved the measure in a 4-3 partisan vote Wednesday.
Critics said it would be nearly impossible for workers to prove they were let go because employers often don't provide documentation informing workers of their dismissal.
"We are talking about individuals who are struggling day to day, not millionaires," said Democratic Sen. Ed Ableser of Tempe.
The Republican-led Arizona House of Representatives passed the measure in a 36-23 vote along party lines in February.
The federal Department of Labor has raised concerns about the legality of the bill. Under federal law, state officials are tasked with verifying unemployment claims, not employers or applicants.
Thousands of people could be impacted by the proposed change. Arizona's unemployment rate was 7.9 percent in December, according to the Department of Labor. The maximum weekly unemployment benefit in Arizona is $240.
Under the measure, applications who don't include documents backing the unemployment claim would be deemed invalid. Employers would be allowed to claim that the employee submitted a verbal resignation to prove the worker voluntarily left the job. Employers also could avoid paying the claims if they say the worker skipped work.
"If you have an employee that walks out and doesn't come back, we believe the burden should be on that employee to prove or at least state why they believe they should be eligible for unemployment," said Eric Emmert of the East Valley Chambers of Commerce Alliance.
An amendment to the bill approved Wednesday would require the state to make a final determination based on all submitted evidence, but critics complained that change does little to protect terminated workers.
Ellen Sue Katz, litigation director of the William E. Morris Institute for Justice in Phoenix, said the measure is a violation of federal law because it would allow the state to skirt its responsibility of evaluating each claim, which would overwhelmingly benefit employers.
"This bill rewards employers who have no written policies and do not give separation notices," the institute wrote in a statement to lawmakers.
Copyright 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Click on the region names in the map below to see news from that region.
RIGHT NOW: Top Stories
Officer Daryl Raetz died after he was struck by a vehicle during a DUI traffic stop early Sunday morning.
A “safety alert” is being distributed to homes in and around the Trilogy at Power Ranch neighborhood in southeast Gilbert after a couple of people were seen possibly casing homes for burglaries, neighbors said.
Here's a FIRST look at the movie trailer based on the life of notorious Valley murderer Jodi Arias.
Cooler air is moving in soon. Find out how far temperatures will drop by Memorial Day.
A federal judge has ruled that the office of America's self-proclaimed toughest sheriff systematically racially profiled Latinos in its trademark immigration patrols.
Consumers are speaking out after being charged by a rental car company for extra insurance coverage they say they did not want.