Hear Me Out: Can AZ afford to lose migrant workers in light of SB1070?

Money

Copyright 2010 Scripps Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Advertisement

Posted: 05/27/2010

PHOENIX - The nation faces tough questions in tough times, and there are people on both sides of every issue.

Arizona is no different. But who’s saying what about the issues important to Arizonans?

ABC15.com has launched a weekly segment called "Hear Me Out," and each Sunday we're debuting an Arizona issue - along with two opposing sides on the topic.

Don’t worry, you always have the opportunity to make comments at the bottom of the page. Yeah, your opinion matters too.

This week we're tackling the debate over the economic impact of Arizona's new immigration law, and whether our state can afford to lose migrant workers in the country illegally.

Some say Senate Bill 1070 will have a negative effect on Arizona's economy, especially our state's agricultural industry. They argue an already flailing market cannot afford to lose its work force.

Others contend the law will have positive implications for Arizona's economy, decreasing the number of undocumented workers operating in an underground market, as well as their dis-proportionate use of government benefits.

So, can Arizona afford to lose migrant workers in light of SB 1070?

 

YES, ARIZONA CAN AFFORD TO LOSE WORKERS: By By Rachel Alexander, Editor, intellectualconservative.com

Arizona’s tough new illegal immigration bill, SB1070, will have a net positive effect on the economy.

It will decrease the number of illegal workers operating in the underground economy.

The open borders lobby claims that illegal immigrants take jobs that Americans won’t do, and warn that there will be no one to do jobs like lettuce picking or landscaping, so costs of certain products and services will dramatically increase. This is not accurate.

In reality, illegal immigrants take jobs at wages Americans won’t accept. Much of the work illegal immigrants perform is in the service industry, like landscaping, nail salons, and fast food restaurants. These are non-necessary services that Americans could cut back on if their prices really were to increase dramatically.

The dire warnings about the cost of goods drastically increasing are grossly exaggerated.

Since the price of labor is just one of many factors that goes into the cost of a head of lettuce, if the price of labor were to double, the increase in the price of lettuce would be negligible.

Agricultural economist Philip Martin of the University of California-Davis performed a study which found that if the cost of labor increased 40% due to a lack of illegal workers, the average person would spend $8 more per year on fruits and vegetables.

And in the past, when agricultural businesses have been confronted with higher costs of labor, they have made up for it by advancing the technology used at a faster pace, allowing them to use fewer workers. The higher labor costs forced businesses to become more cost-efficient and update their technology.

Illegal immigrants disproportionately use a larger share of government benefits than the rest of the population.

This is because they are generally less-educated than the rest of the population, and take lower-paying jobs without healthcare, instead using our emergency rooms for healthcare.

Arizona had the second worst deficit in the country last year after California, no doubt caused in part by huge social welfare costs. Arizona currently has a $3 billion budget deficit.

SB1070 permits government agencies to share information and verify claims of residency in order to determine eligibility for benefits. Eliminating illegal immigrants from government services like welfare will bring back stability to the budget, increasing Arizona’s attractiveness to businesses considering relocating here.

With the budget in better shape, there is less danger the legislature will pass laws increasing taxes on business. The budget will also improve as the costs of fighting crime decrease. Illegal immigrants disproportionately commit more crimes than the rest of the population, particularly in areas relating to identity theft.

SB1070 may result in fewer illegal immigrants purchasing goods and services in Arizona, but those stores will either find new customers as people move to Arizona from other states, or will shut down and reemerge in the economy in an area where there is demand. The free market will adjust to reflect changing economic needs.

In addition, illegal immigrants generally don’t put a lot back into the economy here, they send a significant portion of their earnings back to Mexico. There are many towns in Mexico comprised of mostly women and children and the elderly, due to the men having left to work in the U.S. Last year, Mexican families received more than $17 billion in remittances.

If illegal immigrants leave Arizona, others will move here to replace them.

Arizona is one of the most popular states for relocation. As one of the fastest growing states in the nation, there is no lack of people moving to Arizona to take and create jobs.

Any negative economic effects will be deliberately

caused by activists filing costly lawsuits against the state, or open borders proponents like far left Arizona Congressman Raul Grijalva (D) who has called for a boycott of Arizona over SB1070.

Fortunately, supporters of the bill have organized a “buycott” to counter Grijalva’s anti-Arizona sentiment, urging people to buy products and services from Arizona and boycott the companies boycotting Arizona.

SB1070 may not be the best solution for fixing our broken borders. The real problem underlying illegal immigration is the additional costs they burden our economy with; disproportionately composed of unskilled workers, they consume an economically unsustainable level of government services.

The optimal fix would be to greatly reduce the government welfare state, so additional low-skilled immigrants would not burden the economy. Unfortunately, political leaders are not interested in resolving the problem this way, so SB1070 is the best alternative.

Do you agree with this opinion? Click add a comment below to sound off.

 

NO, ARIZONA CANNOT AFFORD TO LOSE WORKERS: By Canon Carmen B. Guerrero
Canon for Peace & Justice


As the debate concerning SB1070 continues, I would like to take a moment to speak for those who are too busy today picking your fruits and vegetables, gardening your homes and hotels, preparing meals in your restaurants, caring for your children, and cleaning your houses, to speak for themselves.

I am one of many Episcopal clergy who work with people of all walks of life in this country and specifically in Arizona. We do not ask where they came from, how they got here, or what language they speak. However, we do experience the connection between employment and mental and physical wellbeing Contrary to stereotypes of hundreds of Spanish speakers who attend our services, need our outreach ministry in areas of health, food, or housing, many are here legally.

As part of our ministry we are involved with families whose men and women are the true backbone of the construction industry, hotel and restaurant industry, child care work, and domestic and business cleaning employment issues across our state.

Many include the people we see on the side of the road, often working in temperatures that exceed 100 degrees, picking your fruits and vegetables; those we see on rooftops fixing your roofs in 115 degree temperatures; and those gardening your beautiful landscapes. On my way to the office each day I see the workers picking cotton, lettuce, cabbage, corn, etc.; and I realize these are but a few of the workers which make a significant contribution to our state’s economy.

Thus, I would like to take a moment to address the myth that SB1070 will not hurt those that are legally here.

In fact, SB1070 will not only hurt our farmworker clients, but also the $9.2 billion agricultural industry in Arizona, to say nothing about the other areas of very low-paid unskilled employment, which provides an income below the federal poverty level, in substandard working conditions.

As a Priest in the Episcopal Church, I visit these families and I see firsthand that they lack the things we take for granted: healthcare, decent housing conditions, enough food for our children, good education for our children, cars, and access to basic services. Their days often begin before 5 a.m. and do not end until sunset. Because many do not drive, they do not carry drivers licenses or other forms of identification.

Under SB1070, a legal worker under these circumstances would be fined a minimum of $500.00 and /or be arrested until he/she can provide proof of being here legally. To be fined or arrested takes money from these workers that would be devastating to their family.

In fact, every major employer in Arizona will eventually be forced to acknowledge that we cannot afford to lose this work force. These workers perform the lowest paying jobs that other Americans simply won’t do.

Do any of us have an unemployed friend or family member willing to cut watermelon in Aguila during an Arizona summer, do gardening in 120 degree temperatures, or work 7 days a week at the discretion of some employers?

Our labor shortage would be even worse were it not for the passage of the Immigration Reform and Control Act, signed in 1986 by Ronald Reagan, which provided a path towards legalization for agricultural workers and immigrants who had been in the U.S. continuously and illegally since 1982. Many of those naturalized as the result of that act have made significant contributions to Arizona’s economy. The passage of SB1070 makes an already vulnerable population more so.

Our state cannot afford to [lose] this enormous portion of the workforce. SB1070 will injure our work force and a vital industry to our state.

Do you agree with this opinion? Click add a comment below to sound off.

Copyright (c) 2009 Newspaper Enterprise Assn.

  • Comments
  • Marketplace
advertisement

Did You Hear?


  1. What? Tracking students using microchips

    What? Tracking students using microchips

    A school district in San Antonio has just unveiled plans to test out a new microchip system that will track students.

  2. Huh? Bike-riding Darth Vader robs bank

    Huh? Bike-riding Darth Vader robs bank

    The force was with employees an Ohio bank on Wednesday when a man wearing a Darth Vader mask robbed the place at gunpoint.

    • PHOTOS: AARP's sexiest men over 50

      PHOTOS: AARP's sexiest men over 50

      Who says older men can't be sexy? AARP just came out with its list of Sexiest Men Over 50 and the list is not just based on looks. Check out who made the list!

      More Hear Me Out


      1. Should children get an allowance?

        Should children get an allowance?

        HEAR ME OUT: This weekend's debate is whether children should get an allowance to do chores, or if chores should just be a requirement as a family member.

        • Does program really help homeowners?

          • Chances of GOP beating Pres. Obama?

            • 'Wallow' arsonists punished enough?

              • What will bring down cost of gas?

                • Allow employers to deny birth control?

                  • Stay Connected