On the Go: RSS | Email Alerts | Mobile and iPhone


Set Text Size SmallSet Text Size MediumSet Text Size LargeSet Text Size X-Large

Do hand sanitizers really work? We put them to the test


Last Update: 10/27 8:09 pm
Reported by: Linda Hurtado, abcactionnews.com 


Everyone is always looking for ways to keep their families healthy.  The CDC says washing your hands is the best way to protect yourself against getting sick. 

But is it? What about those hand sanitizers many people carry around. Do they work better? Or at all?

Many Valley kids are doing it; playing games like basketball and cheering each other on from the sidelines. You better believe that plenty of their hands touched the ball too.

This is often how viruses and other bacteria are spread. So we put hand sanitizers to the test and found out if they’re the same and if soap and water better protect you from getting sick.

In the test, 16 nine and ten-year-olds tried eight products, half name brand hand sanitizers and half generics. Four others tried soap and/or just water. 

Here's one student's theory: "If you wash your hands with water you get a couple off your hands, but if you use soap and water you'll probably get most of the germs off your hands."

The test worked like this: Each child touched their finger tips to a petri dish before treatment. Then a squirt of hand sanitizer and they touched the petri dish again. Most hand sanitizers contain some kind of alcohol compound, either ethyl or isopropyl.

Then the petri dishes were sent to Burt Anderson, a Professor of Molecular Medicine at the University of South Florida. "We put them into an incubator to allow the bacteria to grow."

The results were pretty clear. In the petri dish from one student's test, Burt Anderson says there were 90 to 100 colonies of bacteria before she used Walgreens foaming hand sanitizer.

“In this case it was a hand sanitizer using the compound called benzalkonium chloride. You can see a drastic and dramatic reduction to no colonies at all,” Anderson says.

Afterwards, Anderson made this observation, "In this case it was a hand sanitizer using the compound called benzalkonium chloride. You can see a drastic and dramatic reduction to no colonies at all."

While the Walgreens brand did the best, three other hand sanitizers showed significant reductions in bacteria. Anderson says, "So clearly these hands sanitizers have an effect in reducing the number of bacteria."

Four showed moderate to slight results and only one hand sanitizer showed little to no reduction.

But overall did hand sanitizers beat good old soap and water? Anderson says, "In our particular case, and again our sampling is small, there was not a dramatic difference between the children that washed their hands with soap and water after washing in terms of the total number of bacteria growth. I was a little surprised."

Anderson thinks those results indicate kids aren't washing their hands long enough or correctly.

The CDC recommends you use warm water and soap for about 20 seconds.

So what should parents and kids take away from this experiment?

Anderson says, "I think it shows the value of hand sanitizers. The CDC recommends it as an alternative to do that also to control the H1N1 virus and it has no negative effect but clearly reduces the number of microbes, bacteria and viruses on your skin."




Daily show info, tips, and more!

Phoenix officers get down and dirty to save kitten in drain
The people who found the distressed kitten adopted him and named him after one of his rescuers.
Humane Society opens pet shop in upscale Phoenix mall
There will be a 10 percent discount on all purchases this weekend. Video Watch Video
'Cat' swine flu case raises new concerns for pet owners
The case is testing conventional wisdom, which held that humans could not spread the virus to animals. Video Watch Video
  This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.